So Why Exactly Does Eric Holder still have a job? -
During Senate Judicial testimony about why not one person responsible
for the 2008 economic crash has ever been prosecuted, America's top
prosecutor had this to say:
I'm concerned that the size of some of these institutions becomes so large that it does become difficult to prosecute them when we are hit with indications that if you do prosecute, if you do bring a criminal charge, it will have a negative impact on the national economy
So in another words Mr.Attorney General banks have now gotten so big they can threaten United States with economic catastrophe if you try to arrest their executives and you more or less admitting that there are two separate legal systems. One for mega corporations and rich people and another for the rest of us. Right. So who else is too big to prosecute? Terrorists? Drug Dealers? Mobsters?
To understand
how completely incompetent Eric Holder is, imagine a 'bankster' trying
to tell J.Edgar Hoover prosecuting them would be hazardous to the
nation's economic health. Hoover would probably respond the way Ray
Lewis would if you poked him in the eye and called him ugly. Because you
simply could not threaten or intimidate a man who enjoyed the feel of
soft satin that came from wearing negligee and women's panties
(allegedly) under that manly FBI suit.
Since were talking about stealing money...how is your 401K doing?
- Remember when 401K's were the route to wealthy retirement because
those old, stuffy ideas of guaranteed income such as pensions and Social
Security were outdated because Wall Street knew best how to handle
money right and get the best return? Well not really says an analysis by
Slate.com showing even if your 401K survived the big Wall
Street crack-up of five years ago and actually made money, 20% of your
potential savings went to fees, and commissions. So if you managed to
make $100,000, you would only have $80,000 because the other $20,000 got
siphoned off by investment firm for the 'privilege' of managing your
money. Bloomberg's Josh Barro (not exactly raging pinko, socialist)
essentially sums up 401K's as bullshit and proposes expanding Social
Security to 20% more than currently paid out.
The US Supreme Court had the gayest week ever! - This past week the US Supreme Court heard two sure to be groundbreaking cases. One involving overturning California's Proposition 8 (Perry v. Schwarzenegger), an odious ballot referendum in 2008 that stripped gay and lesbians' right to marry after it had already been granted by California's Supreme court. The other (United States v. Windsor) deciding whether the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which barred the Federal Gov't from recognizing married gay couples was unconstitutional.
The US Supreme Court had the gayest week ever! - This past week the US Supreme Court heard two sure to be groundbreaking cases. One involving overturning California's Proposition 8 (Perry v. Schwarzenegger), an odious ballot referendum in 2008 that stripped gay and lesbians' right to marry after it had already been granted by California's Supreme court. The other (United States v. Windsor) deciding whether the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which barred the Federal Gov't from recognizing married gay couples was unconstitutional.
Reading the tea leaves, legal
analysts when not busy finding ways to bill clients $200 an hour for
their legal services speculated DOMA would be overturned due to the
Equal Protection clause in the 14th amendment of the Constitution.
Translated from pig Latin legalese, it means Gov't can't deny
certain groups equal protection under the law just because you don't
like them. Prop 8 will probably be overturned due to a technicality
because private individuals (in this case raging homophobes from out of
state) can't defend a public law that the California Gov't neither
wanted nor asked for.
The Prop 8 ruling likely won't
apply Nationally, so backwaters like Alabama and Oklahoma can still keep
their gay marriage bans...for now. However the real victory was the
Plaintiffs challenging Prop 8 delivered a proverbial legal smackdown
eviscerating every argument anti-gay advocates have used in the past to
deny gay marriage. The knock out punch was delivered when the defendants
for Prop 8 had no response when asked 'If marriage should only be
between a man and woman because gay couples can't procreate, why
then are heterosexual couples who cannot or do not want children allowed
to marry?' Bazinga! The plaintiffs finished out the closing
arguments with a mic drop after delivering the verse 'Ring the bell.It's
over.'
So here's how Kim Kardashian helped ensure marriage equality will become reality
- To understand how momentous these Supreme Court cases were, check out
the trend chart showing the survey of Americans approving gay marriage
since 2004. Look at the trends after 2010, and suddenly support for gay
marriage starts skyrocketing to where in 2013 reportedly it's now up to
58% which in Social Sciences is unprecedented. So what happened in 2011
to suddenly start changing people's mind?
Kim
Kardashian, who Joel McHale accurately summarized as being famous for
having a big ass, a sextape and starring in a reality TV show with her
dead behind the eyes sisters. Apparently she had found true love with
Kris Humphries and decided to share that love for all the World in a
yearlong 24/7 media orgy and punctuated by a fairytale wedding
(televised of course) and dream marriage ...which lasted for about 74
days.
My theory is when the rancid, decaying, maggot
infested stench emanating from the corpse of this publicity stunt
infiltrated the collective nostrils of America. It caused millions of
thinking people who were previously unsure about gay marriage to
reconsider after realizing any two morons by virtue of simply being
heterosexual can get together to have a 'marriage'. But two loving,
committed gay or lesbians who spend a lifetime together as was the case
for the plaintiffs challenging DOMA could not which is just plain wrong.
Unlike oral sex there actually is such a thing as a bad pizza
- Recently it came to light that Papa John's Pizza was threatening
bloggers of any size with lawsuits for talking ill of company CEO John
Schnatter who recently threw a public tantrum over having to provide
health insurance to his minimum wage employees under the new Healthcare
reform. Schnatter threatened he'd have to raise prices a whopping $0.20
per pizza to cover this new insurance.
Not
that I'd ever order one of Papa John's shitty pizzas because living New
Jersey we are blessed with an abundance of family owned pizzerias far
superior to anything mass production pizzas companies could dish out.
But I think I speak for decent people that I would not mind paying an
extra $0.20 if it meant the guy delivering my pizza could see a doctor
without going broke. Herein lies the problem with oligarchs like
Schnatter, they don't get that they either provide workers with a decent
living wage or they end up supporting a social welfare programs through
higher taxes because employees are to poor to afford decent health
insurance.
Stupid Human (Resource) Tricks - Anyone
whose ever worked in an office or large corporate setting knows that
Human Resources is really just another word for 'people who could not
hack it in Business school so would up doing this instead'. Typically HR
reps are fall into the category of useful idiots, people
semi-intelligent but not enough to actually bring anything of value in a
skilled labor pool. So they are used as corporate hacks, there to take
all the slings and arrows of employees when corporate makes unpopular
decisions and some how put a bright, smiley, spin on it (like calling
$2,500 deductible health insurance a 'consumer directed health plan')
So
it comes as no surprise according to a study done by Greg Beato in the
Wall Street Journal that showed everything Human Resources thought they
knew about hiring was (predictably) wrong. For instance:
1.The
classic Briggs-Myers personality test is actually not a good indicator
of personality. Neither is a person's credit score a good indicator of
dependability.
2.Switching jobs frequently can actually be a good thing because shows worker is highly motivated to have a fulfilling career.
3.Most
people who have gone more than 5 years after committing a small minor
criminal offense without incident are no higher risk than people who
have no criminal record. Especially if that offense was during college.
4.Telecommuting and flexible schedules actually make people more productive not less.
5.Facebook
profiles are not adequately reflective of how someone would be at
work plus most people are smart enough to make their profiles private
anyway.
6.And if someone is stupid enough to post a racist
rant, brag about criminal activity, or a scandalous picture to social
media than they're probably not smart enough for an important job
anyway.
7.Everyone has figured a canned response to the inevitable questions that start with 'So tell me about a time when...'
What Sour Grapes Must Taste Like -
Lost amid all the hub-bub with the Supreme Court cases over gay
marriage was another equally important case regarding race based
admissions into colleges heard last Fall. The case is Fisher v.
Texas which involves a now 23 year-old who did not get into Univ. of
Texas after high school and cited the policy of preferential admission
for minorities for instances when deciding on applicants who are 'on the
bubble' as the unfair the reason she didn't get in. I'm not going to
debate if colleges need race based admissions but from reading the trial
briefs it seems more of a case of sour grapes than of any sort of
discrimination. Not sure how her lawyrers explained why roughly 160
minority applicants with a higher GPA than Fisher also did NOT get into
UT, while roughly 70 white applicants with a lower GPA than Fisher DID
get in.
Despite Texas' reputation as a collection of
rednecks residing in a hub of ignorance resulting in woeful public
schools (49th behind Mississippi, hook 'em horns!) it's university
system is actually very good with UT-Austin considered one of the best
public universities in the country. And I mention sour grapes for
Ms.Fisher since UT-Austin automatically accepts Texas high school
seniors who are in the Top 10 percent academically of their graduating
class. These people account for 75% of UT-Austin's incoming Freshmen
class at any given year leaving the out of state and 'on-the-bubble'
applicants to compete for other 25% of spots.
Had
Ms.Fisher been in that Top 10% her acceptance would have been
guaranteed, but let's face it if you are on the outside of that 10% than
you probably did not apply yourself well enough in the four years of
high school. But rather than do what high school seniors have done for
decades which is accept it and move on. Plus despite Fisher initially
being offered a chance to transfer to UT for her Sophomore year if her
Freshman college grades were good enough. Apparently she had herself
a holy temper tantrum and her Daddy lawyered up with a educational
reform think-tank with an agenda and...yada,yada,yada...her little pity
party could adversely affect minority placement in top colleges.
So
I want any 8th grader gearing up for the big show of high school next
Fall to pay close attention and not be like Ms.Fisher....
So here's something Every 9th grader should hear
- For high school growing up in Columbus, Ohio I went to St.Charles, an
all boys Catholic high school that was academically tough and
rigorous. What made St.Charles unique though was rather than cater to
rich, upper class families, it primarily existed to give boys from
lower, working, and middle class backgrounds an opportunity for an
top-flight prep school education. On my first day then Principal Dominic
Cavello, a man I grew to admire and respect gave a speech that frankly
should be required listening of all incoming high school Freshmen. The
basic gist of his speech was:
'As of this day, life begins taking score because from here on out all of your decisions will have consequences, some big, some small, but all collectively will determine your path into the future. Wherever you end up in 4, 8 all the way to 30, 40 years from now will be a direct result of the actions taken (or not taken) by you starting right now. It all counts so my advice to you gentlemen is Carpe Diem!' (Latin for 'Seize The Day')
I
wish I had listened to Mr.Cavello and taken what he meant seriously
because I fell into that trap of just doing enough to get by and not
really putting extra effort into much of anything. I skated through four
years of St.Chuck's with a 2.6 GPA, not bad but not good either and
certainly not worthy of applying to my dream school Northwestern
University in Chicago. Where it hit me that I had wasted a golden
opportunity, was graduation when it was announced that the Top 10% of my
class had gotten into the elite colleges such as the Ivy Leagues,
Stanford, Vanderbilt, Notre Dame, and yep Northwestern. And 52% of my
class got academic scholarships to wherever they were headed. Of course a
2.6 GPA does not get you any of those things accept guaranteed
admission to a open enrollment state university (Hello Bowling Green
with its 'tough' 2.3 minimum GPA needed for admission) with the saving
grace of parents willing to pay for tuition.
Unlike
Ms.Fisher I learned from my mistake, applied myself in college, got a
3.3 GPA and eventually landed a scholarship to grad school and down the
career path to where I'm now. But it always nagged me if I graduated
from high school with something close to a 4.0 what could have been. I
may have well still wound up at Bowling Green but it would have been a
hell of lot cheaper for myself and my parents.
And
it's not just in academics but how you choose to invest your time while
in high school. Will you choose to find yourself so to grow emotionally
and intellectually or lose yourself in the petty social rituals like
hanging with the cool kids and parties? Will you learn to build
meaningful friendships and how to relate with other people or play the
part of the angst ridden teenager or worse a bully? Will you venture
outside and explore the World or remain inside and let computer or video
games be your reality? Will you do something positive that contributes
to a community like a sport, club, or the arts or be negative and tear
others down by being an insolent little troll?
This is
something I will impart to my kids when the time comes. But
meanwhile for all you 8th graders gearing up for 9th grade, my advice to
you is Carpe Diem!
No comments:
Post a Comment